Recommendation for further blogs

This blog describes comprehensive information about technology and its impact to our lives.

http://xgregx.wordpress.com/

In this blog you can find controversial pictures and issues which govern the world in these days.

http://linda03.wordpress.com

This page briefly describes how sexual issues in advertising have changed in process of time.

http://sexinads.wordpress.com/

Interesting blog that is concern about increasing problem of Eating disorders which are many times caused by abnormally thin woman and models in modern magazines.
http://zhazira.wordpress.com

Layout of this weblog is really joyfull and in addition it clearly explain how are little children influenced by adverting inmedia.

http://web.mac.com/daniela.mikus/BLOGPROJECT/Welcome.html

Introduction

The main idea of this blog is to show how we view the morality and ethics of journalists and their work. I am not going to talk about reliable newspapers or magazines but about those that change and model information to be the most shocking and attractive for readers. Journalists of the yellow press are able to pursue celebrities thousands miles to get sensationalist images that are then send all around the world. Hiding behind freedom of speech they think they can annoy anybody. They do not know that besides freedom of speech there is also something called freedom of privacy. There are some questions related to this theme we should ask. Do the paparazzi have a right to pursue famous people? Why society needs more and more controversial information about people it is interest in? Do you think we can blame just journalists for this immorality? We all are part of this acting that destroys the moral values of our society. We are attacked by paparazzi reports from all sides and although we know they are untrustworthy we still like them. We should realize at which cost they were acquired and how these gossip´s information can hurt those who play the main role in the undependable articles.

Britney Spears Paparazzi Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGxV0QllcZE&eurl=http://www.weshow.com/us/p/26749/britney_spears_curses_paparazzi

Diana and her Life with Paparazzi

The most well-known paparazzi and celebrity story is the tragedy of princess of Wales Diana and her spouse Doddy Al Faied. Lady Diana had never liked photographers and journalists, especially those who hunt her at every turn. They were waiting for occasions when Diana would meet her lovers or be in swimming suits at the luxury yacht. Her personal life was under the supervision of paparazzi and they were even a part of her and Doddy´s death. On August 30, 1997, pursued by hungry-driven paparazzi on all sides, Diana’s Mercedes Benz sedan crashed shortly after midnight Paris time in a tunnel along the Seine River at the Pont de l’Alma bridge. There are many speculations that describe princess´s death. However, most of them illustrate paparazzi behavior after accident very negatively. Film held from the cameras of two paparazzi showed that they were taking photographs of the car and the occupants almost immediately after arrival at the scene. There were no emergency services near the car visible in their photographs. Witnesses at the inquest into their deaths described how photographers were “on the car” to get shots but made no attempt to assist those inside. Every tabloid wants to have the first photographs of the scandals of the rich and famous. After all, the bigger the scandal, the more money the tabloids make. Mr Al Fayed, Doddy´s Al Faied father said in a statement: “This lovely couple was murdered, with the paparazzi being used as a cover for the murder, and sooner or later I will succeed in exposing the full facts, and the people who committed such a horrendous crime.” Although a lot of people like Doddy´s father blame just paparazzi for their deaths, there were many other factors that led to this tragedy. Investigators blamed the crash on driver Henri Paul who was found to have been drinking before driving at high speed to evade the pursuing paparazzi. Nevertheless, paparazzi played one of the main roles in this tragedy and were the ones exclusively prosecuted by several of nations. It is obvious that Diana’s loss enlarged very much the antipathy and annoyance against the paparazzi.

Karel Svoboda

It is a year ago when we could read and listen everywhere that Karel Svoboda, who was a Czech notable composer of popular music, was found dead from gunshot wounds in the garden of his villa at Jevany near to Prague. It is believed that he committed suicide. He was not yet 24 hours death when somebody wanted to sell controversial photos to the most well-known yellow press in the Czech Republic– to Blesk. The pictures showed how he was laying and in his hand he held a gun. Next day Blesk published the photo of dead Karel Svoboda; this picture covered the whole front page. I think that it was probably the most productive day for Blesk regarding the number of sold print. People are eager to sensations, especially when they are connected with famous people. However, where is ethics of this magazine? Although it was not Blesk journalist who took this photo, people from this journal promptly bought these pictures from the policeman who, be on service, took a number of photos of the dead man. They did not mind his family, friends, and they published it next day in the way that everybody had to notice what had happened and bought this press. It is ridiculous that in the same time Blesk states within its magazines how “it is horrible that somebody wanted to sell these photos and even thought there was offered disgusting business Blesk finally bought pictures. The only reason why magazine bought them was to prohibit seller in further propagation. Blesk made a decision to do not use those photos, only on the front page.” It is really nice how redactors and journalists of yellow press such as Blesk have a gift to change even the most immoral and disgusting information for their own benefit.

How Paparazzi Work

http://photoravlik.blogspot.com/2006/08/how-paparazzi-work.html

This article by Robert Valdes illustrates comprehensive information about paparazzi. Firstly, you can learn about very interesting origin of Paparazzi name which was derived from Fellini film “La Dolce Vita”. Then there some words how they behave in terrain. For example they have a several informers and frequently work with autographers who stalk celebrities. According to Valdes “the key for the paparazzo is to get the information and get the shot before other paparazzi do.” Paparazzi tactics often means to stop at nothing; they are capable of taking pictures from roofs or tree tops. Further reading illustrates how many times it is difficult for paparazzi to sell photography. Usually those who are successful have their own peoples for finding buyers.To catch desirable celebrity photo, journalists of yellow press used technologies such as small digital cameras and cameras phones. Usage of those equipments is briefly described in article. Valdes also provides a several examples of tactics used by celebrities to defend obtrusive journalists. He claims that “celebrities use multiple cars to cover travel routes” and “false press statements and an alias can cover a celebrity’s whereabouts.” Finally, article discusses right of privacy and the laws of photography because these issues are still the subject to discuss.

Paparazzi

http://www.caslon.com.au/photonote8.htm

An interesting reading from the sites of Unauthorized Photos show paparazzi history and how they work has changed during the time. Also you can read five illustrations why paparazzi are of interest to students of unauthorized photography. They show you cases which caused growth of paparazzi and their “dirty” work. A two of them for example are “decline of the studio system in the US” and “strengthening of perceptions that the audience owned the celebrity.” Next information provides you with paparazzi motivation for hunting celebrities. The site also let you know about weak rights that could protect celebrities from paparazzi whose work is presently quite legal. They can photograph celebrities who appear in public places. However, according to article “Some paparazzi go beyond those boundaries. Others subvert them.” Specification of illegal actions used by paparazzi is really fascinating. In conclusion, author gives examples of publishers and particular nations responses to immoral paparazzi behavior.

http://www.allthatgossip.com/

This website shows gossips and mainly photos and articles with erotic overtones of woman celebrities. It is evident that photographers who took the photos had to sneak in secret to get desired trophy. There are really simple articles that attend just to nakedness and unconscious uncovering of the places that should be covered. I recommend this page to visit because it briefly demonstrates that paparazzi take an each opportunity, even below the mark.

http://www.weshow.com/us/videos/post/search?text=Paparazzi

This is a video page and its link called Paparazzi clearly shows how journalists of yellow press abuse and hunt celebrities wherever they go. Clicking on some videos, you can see how paparazzi pursue famous stars to café bars, restaurants, shopping stores. Sometimes celebrities are almost blinded by clicking cameras that seem never stopped.

http://www.mrpaparazzi.com/

The last website is again about celebrities and their personal lives. It describes moments that seem to most of us unimportant and foolish. Not only that this site informs us about famous people´s daily lives, flubs, and loves but it also encourages people to sell celebrity photos, gossips and videos.

Who bears the responsibility?

It would be impossible to exist in the civilization without some rules of ethics and morality because we all are a part of society and lacking this needed factors we would live there worse than animals. Some rules are given by states and to infringe them is illegal. On the other side there are lawful situations where we are aware of their absurdity. Unfortunately in many fields of our culture we can find an absolute absence of moral values and principles. Especially in some certain magazines, that very often and with pleasure called themselves reliable sources, we can observe how they try to attract readers with shocking, controversial, disgusting, and mostly false and misleading information. Their journalists pursue celebrities to get desirable photography everywhere.

Celebrities choose their careers themselves. Everybody knows that stars´ lives are connected with all the glory, journalists, shows, events and paparazzi therefore many of us look at famous persons´ complains with contempt. However, we do not comprehend that these people can just love acting or singing for audiences but on the other hand they need some while for themselves with their families, friends, and partners without disturbing journalists hunting them with clicking cameras at every turn. Paparazzi are often very annoying and obtrusive; therefore some celebrities use their own ways and tricks to defend from paparazzi. Robert Valdes in his article How Paparazzi Work wrote that “Supermodel Heidi Klum took a similar approach to keep paparazzi away from her daughter. Celebrity children are a favorite of paparazzi — “That’s why I released the photos of her, instead of having photographers hunt for them,” Klum told USA Today” (Valdez).

We should realize it is the public that form the market for these pictures and videos of intimacy stolen from people’s private lives. As long as a market exists for photos, and the prices are extremely high for, there will be people who take these photos without scruples how they must hunt their victims (Colton). We – readers are countable for that dishonesty of yellow press from the most part because they provide what we buy. It is really sad that professional photographers, who are trying to create beauty and art, get an absurd amount in comparison to paparazzi who took shocking and scandal photos of some celebrity.

It is creditable that at least some of nations, mainly in Europe, limit paparazzi activities by passing laws that describe in detail where, when, and under what conditions they can take a photos. “In Germany and France, photographers need the permission of the people in their photograph.” (Paparazzi). However, in USA where paparazzi annoyance is the most wide spread, these laws missing. I just mention the You Tube video, where Britney Spears wanted to buy a cappuccino in one coffee shop. I was surprised that she did not blind from all (a several tens) obtrusive clicking cameras that were given just a few centimeters from her face. Normal people went mad; she just looked apathetically which is obvious when we realize that photographers pursue her day by day, minute by minute.

It is true that paparazzi are an integral part of celebrities’ business. Often famous people are grateful to every article in which they appear. Nevertheless, paparazzi frequently violate limits of human propriety, morality and many times they show us how they have absolutely no scruples, especially in the cases of deaths. Therefore I´m for strict laws that would specify events and situations in which they are allowed to take photographs. Only this act could prevent them from dishonest and offending behavior.

Works Cited

Colton, Jay. “ A Question of Conscience.” Greenspu.com. 12Sep. 1997. 9 Jan. 2008. <http://www.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0000lW>

“Paparazzi.” Free Articles and Web Content. Amazines.com. 9 Jan. 2008. <http://www.amazines.com/Paparazzi_related.html>

Valdez, Robert. “How Paparazzi Work.” PhotoRavlik.blog. 28 Aug. 2006. 8 Jan. 2008. <http://photoravlik.blogspot.com/2006/08/how-paparazzi-work.html>

Comments on « Hello world!